10 Apr 2015

E72 King's Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 e5 7.Nge2)

E72 King's Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3 (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.g3 O-O 6.Bg2 e5 7.Nge2)

This is from the fourth round game from the same 15 minute tournament as the game I shared yesterday. I was able to struggle my way for the win even though I was on the worse side until move 30 or so. I think I should not basically ever resign until there is a mate in one on the board because otherwise I may resign in a position where I am in a complicated position and misjudge the position and resign, only to discover after the game that the position is even or even slightly better for me. This has happened to me in a couple of games that I have recently analysed. I think I just need to get away from my correspondence games as soon as possible so that I would have time to go through my chess books that have collected dust for years now... I have to see if I can improve my basic level of chess understanding by going through the books or have I reached a limit where I can't learn anything anymore, not that I think that would be possible. I have added one mate in one, two mate in twos and two mate in five puzzles today.

[Event "Tournament 28070887"] [Site "online arena"] [Date "2015.03.19"] [Round "4"] [White "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Black "Taurus"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E72"] [WhiteElo "1809"] [BlackElo "1817"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (5s), TV"] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2015.??.??"] 1. d4 (1. c4 g6 2. Nc3 Bg7 3. d4 {0-1 (42) Ranasinghe,T (1567)-Mendis,D (1589) Colombo 2014}) 1... Nf6 2. c4 g6 (2... d6 3. Nc3 g6 4. e4 {1-0 (46) Machelett, H (2315)-Meyer,C (2310) Germany 1995}) 3. Nc3 (3. g3 Bg7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Ne2 e5 {0-1 (45) Kilani,Z-Camara,H (2325) Thessaloniki 1984}) 3... Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. g3 (5. Nge2 O-O 6. g3 e5 {1-0 (46) Machelett,H (2315)-Meyer,C (2310) Germany 1995}) 5... O-O 6. Bg2 e5 7. Nge2 {0.07/20 E72 King's Indian: 4.e4 d6 5.g3 E72 King's Indian Defense: Pomar System} (7. d5 $1 $16 {0.78/18}) 7... Nc6 {0.69/21} (7... exd4 $11 {0.07/20} 8. Nxd4 Nc6 9. Nxc6 bxc6) (7... Bg4 8. f3 Bd7 9. O-O exd4 10. Nxd4 Nc6 11. Be3 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 Be6 13. Qd3 Nd7 14. Bxg7 Kxg7 15. Nd5 a5 16. Qd4+ Kg8 17. Rac1 Bxd5 18. cxd5 Re8 19. Rfe1 Nc5 20. e5 Qd7 21. f4 Qb5 22. Rcd1 {Machelett,H (2315)-Meyer,C (2310) Germany 1995 1-0 (46)}) 8. h3 $2 {-2.16/20 [#]} (8. d5 $14 {0.69/21 stays ahead.} Nd4 9. O-O (9. Nxd4 exd4 10. Nb5 Nxe4 $11)) (8. dxe5 Nxe5 9. b3 Re8 10. O-O a6 11. Rb1 Bd7 12. Bb2 Rb8 13. f3 b5 14. cxb5 axb5 15. b4 Nc4 16. Bc1 c5 17. Kh1 cxb4 18. Rxb4 Qa5 19. Qb3 d5 20. Nxd5 Nxd5 21. exd5 Bf8 22. a3 Bxb4 {Ranasinghe,T (1567)-Mendis,D (1589) Colombo 2014 0-1 (42)}) 8... Re8 $146 {0.69/20} (8... exd4 $19 {-2.16/20 } 9. Nd5 (9. Nxd4 Nxd4 10. Qxd4 Nxe4 11. Qd3 Nxc3 12. bxc3 Bf5 13. Qd2 (13. Qf3 Re8+ 14. Kf1 Be4 15. Qd1 Bxc3 16. Be3 Bxg2+ 17. Kxg2 Bxa1 18. Qxa1 Qe7 19. Bh6 Qe4+ 20. Kh2 Qe5 21. Qc1 Re6 22. Bf4 Qe2 23. Rf1 Rae8 24. h4 Qxa2 25. Kh3 Qe2 26. Be3 h5 27. Bd4 Qg4+ {Silva,A (1790)-Yano,W (1894) Florianopolis 2003 0-1}) 13... Qf6 14. Bb2 Qe6+ 15. Qe2 Rfe8 16. Qxe6 Bxe6 17. O-O Bxc4 18. Rfe1 c6 19. Rad1 d5 20. a4 a5 21. Ra1 f5 22. Bf1 Bxf1 23. Kxf1 Kf7 {Kilani,Z-Camara,H (2325) Thessaloniki 1984 0-1 (45)}) 9... Nd7) (8... Nxd4 9. Nxd4 exd4 10. Ne2 Re8 11. Bg5 c5 12. O-O h6 13. Bxf6 Qxf6 14. Nf4 Be6 15. Qc2 Rab8 16. Nd3 b5 17. b3 b4 18. a3 a5 19. axb4 axb4 20. Ra7 Re7 21. Qa2 Kh7 22. f4 Rxa7 23. Qxa7 { Fernandez Juan,M-Tronch Ilzarbe,C Valencia 1995 1-0 (40)}) 9. O-O $2 {-1.80/19} (9. dxe5 $14 {0.69/20 keeps the upper hand.} Nxe5 10. b3) 9... exd4 $19 { Black is clearly better.} 10. Nxd4 Nxd4 11. Qxd4 Nxe4 $1 12. Qd3 {-2.56/22} ( 12. Qd1 $142 {-1.94/22} Nxc3 13. bxc3) 12... Nxc3 13. bxc3 Bf5 14. Qd2 c6 15. Ba3 Qf6 {-1.39/23} (15... Qa5 $19 {-2.38/18} 16. Bb4 Qa4) 16. Rac1 {-2.70/20} ( 16. Bxd6 $17 {-1.39/23} Qxc3 17. Qxc3 Bxc3 18. Rac1) 16... c5 {-1.25/23} (16... Rad8 $19 {-2.70/20} 17. Qb2 Bd3) 17. Kh2 {-2.62/22} (17. Bxb7 $17 {-1.25/23} Rab8 18. Bg2) 17... b6 $2 {-0.85/24} (17... Rab8 $19 {-2.62/22} 18. Rfe1 Be6) 18. Bxa8 $17 Rxa8 19. Rfe1 {-1.34/20} (19. Bb2 $15 {-0.52/24}) 19... h5 { -0.87/24} ({Black should play} 19... Be6 {-1.34/20} 20. Qe2 Qf5) 20. Qd5 { -1.41/22} (20. Qf4 $142 {-0.87/24}) 20... Rd8 {Black has strong compensation.} 21. Bb2 {-2.21/19} (21. Qf3 $17 {-1.01/26}) 21... Be6 $19 22. Qd2 {-2.21/19} ( 22. Qg2 {-1.76/21 was worth a try.}) 22... Kh7 {-1.25/23} ({But not} 22... Bxc4 23. h4) (22... Qf5 $19 {-2.21/19} 23. h4 Bh6 $1) 23. Qe2 {-2.01/19} (23. Qf4 $17 {-1.25/23}) 23... Re8 {-1.00/22} (23... Bxc4 $1 $19 {-2.01/19 has better winning chances.} 24. Qxc4 Qxf2+ 25. Kh1 Qxb2) 24. f4 {-1.67/19} (24. Kg1 $17 { -1.00/22 was necessary.}) 24... Bd7 {-0.97/24} (24... h4 $19 {-1.67/19} 25. Rcd1 Bh6) 25. Qf3 $17 Rc8 26. Rcd1 Bc6 27. Qd3 Rd8 28. Re3 {-1.65/20} (28. h4 $17 {-0.78/24}) 28... d5 $2 {0.84/23} (28... h4 $19 {-1.65/20} 29. Re2 Kg8) 29. cxd5 $2 {-1.09/22} (29. Re5 $16 {0.84/23 is forced if you want to stay better.} ) 29... Rxd5 30. Qe2 {[#] Hoping for Rxd5.} Qd6 {-0.10/25} ({Better is} 30... Qf5 $17 {-1.10/22}) 31. Red3 $11 Bb5 $2 {2.63/26} (31... Rxd3 $11 {-0.09/26} 32. Rxd3 Qf6) 32. Rxd5 $18 Bxe2 $2 {8.47/20} (32... Qxd5 {2.59/26} 33. Rxd5 Bxe2) 33. Rxd6 Bxd1 34. Rxd1 Bf6 35. Rd2 Kg7 36. c4 Bxb2 37. Rxb2 {Endgame KR-KP} f6 38. Kg2 Kf7 39. Kf3 Ke6 40. Rd2 a5 41. g4 f5 42. gxf5+ {White mates.} gxf5 43. Rb2 h4 44. Rxb6+ Kd7 45. Rf6 {Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 10%.} 1-0

No comments:

Post a Comment