7 Sept 2015

C66 Spanish Game: Steinitz Defence (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 d6 4.d4 Bd7 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.O-O Be7 7.h3 exd4 8.Nxd4)

C66 Spanish Game: Steinitz Defence (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 d6 4.d4 Bd7 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.O-O Be7 7.h3 exd4 8.Nxd4)

The game below was played in the third round of the 2014 August Banded Threesomes I 1700-1800 tournament that is still in progress at Red Hot Pawn. I have only one game left to finish and so far I have lost all my games on round three. With this win my opponent took the lead in the group and simultaneously I confirmed my last place in this four player group. I have done so many silly mistakes at my games lately at Red Hot Pawn that my rating keeps going down. Well, whenever I will finish my games at RHP, I will take much needed break from correspondence chess for some time. I think after I have taken that break and started playing there again, I will be able to turn things into a more positive direction.

There has been some discussion about the way I post puzzles and some people have certainly expressed their feelings about that. This mostly concerns some positions I posted to social networks and the comments that I have received there. All of those positions appear in this blog of course. Not all the people like the way sometimes there are positions where there is a mate to be found in some number of moves and the side who is doing the mate is up sometimes considerable material. To such positions, some of the people comment things like the position is already won and that the weaker side would have resigned already. Well, it is true that the weaker side could have resigned in that position but that is irrelevant, you are asked to find the mate and not solve it by saying that the weaker side would have resigned in the given position already. If you do not like such positions, it is ok, I do not blame you. But what I tried to argue, fruitlessly in this case, is that no matter what the material difference is on the board if you are in a forced mate, it does not matter if the material is even or you have more material than your opponent or less material than your opponent, the position at the board is still lost. As I am person who does not judge the positions by the beauty aspect alone and want to play the best moves in any given position (mostly failing at it of course), I have added various positions that might not be beautiful as such but feature a mate that can be done in the amount of moves I have indicated against the most resistant defense. I will, whenever I can, post more positions that do not have too high material advantage in favor of the attacker in the future.

[Event "Banded Threesomes"] [Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"] [Date "2015.07.04"] [Round "3"] [White "Vierjoki, Timo"] [Black "Rumdrum"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C66"] [WhiteElo "1801"] [BlackElo "1964"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (30s)"] [PlyCount "52"] [EventDate "2015.??.??"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. d4 Bd7 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. O-O Be7 7. h3 exd4 8. Nxd4 {C66 Spanish Game: Steinitz Defence} O-O {LiveBook: 4 Games} 9. Be3 a6 ( 9... Re8 10. Re1 h6 11. Qd2 Bf8 12. f3 a6 13. Bc4 b5 14. Nxc6 Bxc6 15. Bb3 Bb7 16. Ne2 d5 17. exd5 Nxd5 18. Bf2 c5 19. c3 c4 20. Bc2 Qc7 21. Nd4 Bd6 22. Rxe8+ Rxe8 23. Re1 Rxe1+ 24. Qxe1 {Einarsson,O (1691)-Tan,T (1488) Reykjavik 2016 0-1 (33)}) 10. Be2 Re8 {The position is equal.} (10... b5 11. a3 Re8 12. f4 Nxd4 {1/2-1/2 (12) Kovacs,G (2310)-Koszorus,P (2280) Hungary 1992}) 11. Nf3 $146 (11. Qd2 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 Bc6 13. Bf3 h6 14. Rad1 Qd7 15. Rfe1 Rad8 16. Nd5 Bxd5 17. exd5 Nh7 18. b3 Rb8 19. Bg4 Qd8 20. Bf5 Bg5 21. Rxe8+ Qxe8 22. f4 Bf6 23. Bxh7+ Kxh7 24. Bxf6 gxf6 25. Qc3 Qe4 {Emiroglu,C (2044)-Basaran,B Manila Akhisar 2009 1-0 (57)}) (11. f4 Bf8 12. Bf3 Nxd4 13. Qxd4 c5 14. Qd3 Qe7 15. Bf2 Bc6 16. Rae1 Nd7 17. Re2 Qf6 18. Qd2 b5 19. Rfe1 b4 20. Nd5 Bxd5 21. Qxd5 Qxf4 22. Rf1 {1/2-1/2 (22) Maric,D (2218)-Adamovic,S (2037) Belgrade 2014}) 11... Bf8 12. Nd2 d5 {0.38/24} (12... Be6 $11 {-0.13/27}) 13. exd5 Nb4 14. Bc4 {[#] Strongly threatening a3.} Bf5 15. Bb3 Nbxd5 16. Nxd5 Nxd5 17. Bxd5 { -0.65/27} ({White should try} 17. Qf3 $11 {-0.10/29} Nxe3 18. fxe3 Qxd2 19. Rad1 (19. Qxf5 Qxe3+ 20. Kh1 Kh8 $11) 19... Qxe3+ 20. Qxe3 Rxe3 21. Rxf5) 17... Qxd5 $15 18. c4 Qe6 19. Qb3 {-1.19/25} (19. Qf3 $15 {-0.41/27}) 19... Qc6 20. Rac1 Rad8 21. Rfe1 {-2.74/24} (21. c5 $17 {-1.46/27}) 21... Rd3 $19 22. Rc3 $2 {-5.37/24 [#]} (22. Qd1 {-2.87/31} Bb4 23. Qf3 Qxf3 24. Nxf3 Bxe1 25. Nxe1) 22... Rexe3 $1 {Black is clearly winning.} 23. Rxe3 Rxd2 24. Rg3 g6 25. Rce3 Bd6 26. Rgf3 Be4 {Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 53%.} 0-1

No comments:

Post a Comment